Muhammad Haque reporting from Inner cities Britain Thursday 7 December 2006
AADHIKAR in association with ‘KHOODEELAAR! the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 Area No to CrossRail hole Bill’ campaign
The 4th Edition published from London at 1200 Hrs GMT /UK time on Thursday 7 December 2006
About AADHIKAR Media Foundation, LEGAL DISCLAIMER in brief on accessing these contents and what the word AADHIKAR means Updated on Thursday 16 November 2006Legal and evidential disclaimer: London Wednesday 29 November 2006
Reporting and commentary exclusively commissioned, written, edited and published by AADHIKARonline coming straight from the centre of the East End of London engaged in the battle to defend the community against multifarious attacks by Big Business, their touts in control of the 'local democratic' council [!], an inept band of opposition on the council and assortments of other 'holders of public post' in the name of the local area corresponding to the ‘London Borough of Tower Hamlets’
AADHIKARonline published by the AADHIKAR MEDIA FOUNDATION in association with Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill
Publishing programme on Thursday 7 December 2006
Khoodeelaar! Updated summary of allegations against Crossrail hole backer ‘London mayor’ Ken Livingstone
More on this during Thursday 7 December 2006.
The lies of Christine Gilbert – up until September 2006, less than 10 weeks ago - included the making of untruthful comments about of achievements by schools under control of Tower Hamlets Council
[To be continued]
Pending the outcome of requested-for discussion, we are delaying the publication of the remainders of our reports on the role played by the Spitalfields Housing Association in allowing a space for the holding of a corrupt charade for the touts and agents of the Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London.
The request for a discussion has come to Khoodeelaar! in relation to our communication of legal action notice as now acknowledged by the Spitalfields Housing Association.
The UK’s finance Minister Gordon Brown has been reported today as saying that under his tenure in that office , the UK has witnessed " the longest period of sustained growth in our history".... . That is a lie. A lethal, sustained lie.
Gordon Brown is yet to get into the official address reserved for the UK Prime Minister. The incumbent still is Tony Blair, the man who has given his name to the art of lying.
Gordon has it seems developed one thing in a sustained way – an affinity with lying to the public.
This is not a growth area that any sensible, reasonable fair-minded person would welcome. And this is a growth area that must be curbed. Forthwith. Before Gordon gets into a better position to tell even more numerous lies. So, how could Gordon Brown say what he has just been reported as having said today, even before he entered Number 10 at the ‘rightful’ claimant to that office? Because the statement conceals the truth about the collapse of the welfare state. By welfare here, I am referring to the Pensions and similar safety provisions that for the vast numbers of people, have collapsed under Gordon Brown.. How could this have come about? What is economic growth in a person’s life? Is it a high speed train? Is it an aeroplane? Is it a motor car? By the evidence of the collapse of what used to be referred to as a potential welfare state – meaning a slightly less cruel, greedy, selfish and violence-reliant [home and abroad] society in Britain, it is not sustained in logic that we have seen a sustained economic growth of the sort described boastfully by Gordon Brown.
Gordon Brown must stop all high speed spin. And start the process of returning to telling the truth whilst holding state office.
Britain is NOT experiencing sustained economic growth. It is a myth and a fraud. A capitalist, imperialist, racist fraud. And the casualties are the more than 30 million people whose lives are fraught with nightmares and cycles of nightmares caused by poverty, low income, bad housing, bad health care or no health care and indebtedness…
[To be continued]
Is it possible that the so-called Opposition councillors do not have what it takes to get to grips with the real bread and butter economic and social issues about which the Council has specific duties and responsibilities – and the means?
Is it possible that some councillors on the Opposition do have what it takes at least to get to grips with at least parts of the issues that most affect the community across the Borough? If so, then why isn't there political pressure being felt by the corrupt clique on the Council? Why is the controlling clique able to carry on with a banal and stupidly set agenda for the so-called full council meeting which shows that there is really no need to worry about the Opposition 'councillors' placing the clique under the serious auditing pressure and spotlight on befall of the community? [To be continued]
With pairs and pairs and pairs of poodles that the controlling clique has available to exhibit as ‘proof that we are equally opportunistic’ [More on this theme later] [The phrase ‘equally opportunistic’ has just been coined and published here 1250 GMT Wednesday 6 November 2006]
For a liar in the office of 'London mayor' paid for by public and an office he has kept under his abusive occupation by widespread and pernicious CREATION of strategic poverty so that he would be able to exploit those he pushed into poverty ... [To be continued]
And this charade showed that the Crossrail Bill committee of MPs, were idiotic in their stupid irresponsible recommendation to the effect that cabal link be set up by CrossRail to cover up their inadequacies! We have not even begun on the stupid disgraceful behaviour of the collection of poodles that masquerade as thinking, reasoning and democratically active MPs on that pathetic bureaucracy being falsely referred to as a select committee in all the official sites and documents of the House of Commons [More on this during the day, Wednesday 6 December 2006]
[To be continued]
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! Quotes Ian McWhirter exposing some of the lies being peddled by Crossrail-hole-backer Ken Livingstone and others in their selfish, petty, racist propaganda against the Scottish people. Yesterday [4 December 2006] AADHIKARonline had published this comment on the tendency being f7nted by Livingstone of attacking Scottish people: "The London Guardian BELATEDLY and with evident reluctance and grudge and backhandedness, publishes [in the afternoon of Monday 4 December 2006] a flicker of the truth about the lies of Crossrail hole Bill-backer London liar mayor Ken Livingstone. In the misleadingly titled ‘commentisfree’ slot [which is so restricted that the sheer bureaucracy of getting around its Guardian-congenital lying miasma and of being able to tell or publish any truthful comment on the Guardian’s website is like expecting Polly Toynbee to be happy about anyone wishing to share the truth with the Guardian!], the Guardian lets a Scottish person say that Livingstone’s racist onslaught at the expense of the Scots over alleged subsiding by 'London' of Scotland, was a dangerous lie.
The Livingstone lie is related to a pack that includes claims for Crossrail. Now, why should the Guardian only publish this now, more than a year after Livingstone began this particular lying propaganda? Why hasn’t Polly Toynbee been the one to object to the anti-Scottish lies by Livingstone? Who in London authorised Livingstone to manufacture and then spread the lie IN the name of the people of London and at the expense of the Scottish people and their collective rights and image? " To view Ian McWhirter's comments, CLICK HERE
Khoodeelaar! gives a ‘favourable’ mention to USA’s capitalist chronicler, Forbes! Shock horror indeed!
But that is only the tip of the iceberg! It proves, yet again, that the CRASSNEES of the writers plugging for Crossrail through all the ‘mainstream’ ‘British’ media are and have been and remain CRASS indeed!
That they do not understand or worse, they have no respect for the value of telling the truth.
That it is no good lying to the people. That the first principle of ‘journalism’ is all about telling the truth. Without that understanding and PRACTICE, no ‘writer and broadcaster’ [the expression that often is attached to the morons that are given platforms to opine only because they are ‘writers and broadcasters’] deserves to have tolerance from the public, let alone loyalty because what they spout out is a lie every time they open their mouths or compose their despatch.
Why do I say a favourable word about Forbes? Because they have at least acknowledged the essential grain of what the Rod Eddington report, in the context of the Crossrail plot, has been about. Eddington has NOT endorsed Crossrail I pointed this out hours before the actual Review was launched at news events. I had done that because the Crossrail-promoting- ken-Livingstone-backing Guardian had found out that Crossrail was not going to be promoted by Eddington. So the Guardian actually Polly Toynbeed Eddington in an advance piece against him. That means that the Guardian resorted to the throwing of Polly Toynbee set of lies at Rod Eddington and accused Eddington of not being competent or knowledgeable enough. They rubbished the Eddington Review before it was formally published. However, the Forbes magazine conglomerate in the USA does not depend on the liars that control the Guardians’ finances. As the Daily Mail [Monday 4 December 2006] editorial denounces the Guardian and the Blair regime today – in apiece devoted to showing how the Guardian despite being a poor circulation outlet, is given the major share of the almost £1 billion advertising money by the Blair regime – it is no longer a mystery as to what ‘high values’ inspire the editorial contents deciders on the over-0stated Guardian. It is their pocket and it is their greed. But the Forbes magazine is not dependent on the Blair regime, not at least for its advertising income. So it has actually accurately reported that there is nothing of substance about Crossrail in the Eddington Report! I shall continue to examine all the evidence throughout the rest of the period in the aftermath of the publication of the Eddington Review. View the Forbes report on the Eddington Review HERE
[To be continued]
Brian Liesaid has been filing packs of lies on the so-called business news websites controlled and operated by Bloomberg, the New York-based promoters of Big Business , multinationals and assorted other corrupt agencies of market robbery and looting at the expense of the majority of the people in communities under constant attacks by these looters. Brian Liesaid [the spelling of his published name will be added here] has been plugging away for CrossRail hole Bill for the best parts of the last two years. Most acutely, Liesaid has been promoting the lies of CrossRail hole Bill Ken Livingstone. And those of others who are in concert like CrossRail hole Ken with the setters of the agenda being pushed forward by the lobbyists that are at work include the guises of the UK Houses of Parliament
[To be continued]
– Publishing programme on Saturday 2 December 2006 – The forthcoming editions of the AADHIKARonline news and commentary pages will be dedicated mainly to the series under “Khoodeelaar! Response to the Rod Eddington Report on Transport, as officially published on Friday 1 December 2006”. The report itself is titled as follows: “The Eddington - Transport Study - The case for action -Sir Rod Erdington’s advice to Government December 2006 ”
[in this edition] include these :-Those that had been madly promoting the lie in their media slots to the effect that Rod Eddington would approve of what they had been retailing for the Construction conglomerates [the real forces behind the Crossrail juggernaut] suddenly find their powers of promotion and propaganda failing them just when they were required to show that they were not all drunken liars. To make a factual report on the contents and the implications of the finally published Eddington Review.. The chief propagandist for Big Business touts on Crossrail, the mayor of London Ken Livingstone, was also found to have suddenly lost the ability to insinuate dire threats against the entire UK economy if CrossRail were not rushed and constructed at huge costs to the public purse! Why? One reason is that Eddington is if anything, more a member of the Big Business club than any of the cabal of conceited CrossRail pluggers in the media.
And even they know that Eddington knows what he is talking about, having been at the helm at British Airways for a significant period before being given the task by Gordon Brown to do a review of the UK’s transport economy from the public perspective.
So the only comments they could make, as I denounced their stereotype the lying Crossrail-hole-plot-backer Ken Livingstone-promoting Guardian for doing hours before the actual Review was published, was to condemn Eddington in advance.
And the Ken Livingstone news release in apparent response to the [publication of the Eddington Review, is so bereft of substance that in comparison with this poor show by Livingstone, his usually bankrupt mayoral propaganda handouts and lies- sheets ON OTHER topics appear to have at least ‘some’ substance !
[To be continued]
One of the comment pieces published in the INDEPENDENT on Saturday 2 December 2006 about the Rod Eddington report on Transport actually says that had Eddington been advising the UK Government of the day ten years previously, there would have been no Channel Tunnel rail Link. Which is absolutely clearly in line with the economic analasyis that Khoodeelaar! has been making about the Crass zeal for Crossrail shown by 'the entire establishment' groups so far. Eddington does not endorse Crossrail in a ringing way. And it is because CrossRail is NOT a meritorious project. View the INDEPENDENT piece by-lined to that paper's 'Transport' editor Barrie Clement, by CLICKING HERE